Odisha News / Odisha Advocate General Calls Mahanadi Water Dispute “Artificially Created”

Key Points
Advocate General calls Mahanadi dispute “artificially created.”
Legal battles under previous govt deemed expensive and ineffective.
BJP-led govt pursuing resolution through central mediation.
Bhubaneswar, Sep 25: In a bold statement on the long-standing Mahanadi water dispute, Odisha Advocate General Pitambar Acharya on Thursday accused the previous BJD government in the state of manufacturing the issue and engaging in costly legal battles without genuine intent to resolve it. His remarks come amid renewed efforts by the current BJP-led government to find a solution through central mediation.
“Real Efforts Began After BJP Took Charge”
Speaking to media, Acharya stated, “The Mahanadi water issue between Odisha and Chhattisgarh was artificially created. Expensive legal battles were planned during the previous state (BJD) government. Real efforts to resolve the matter began after BJP formed the government in Odisha. The Centre is mediating, and we are hopeful of a resolution.”
His comments mark a significant shift in narrative around the inter-state water dispute between Odisha and Chhattisgarh, which has persisted for years over the sharing and management of Mahanadi river waters.
📱 Get Argus News App
✨Centre’s Role in Mediation
Acharya emphasized the role of the central government in
facilitating dialogue between the two states. With the BJP now in power in
Odisha, the Advocate General expressed optimism that a resolution could be
reached through constructive engagement rather than prolonged litigation.
Also Read: Odisha Govt Concerned On Mahanadi Issue, Already Talked To Chhattisgarh CM Twice: CM Mohan Majhi
Political Undertones and Legal Legacy
The Mahanadi dispute has been a politically sensitive issue in Odisha, often dominating headlines and legislative debates. Acharya’s statement suggests a departure from the previous administration’s approach, which relied heavily on legal proceedings, including appeals to the Supreme Court and the formation of a tribunal.
The current government’s focus appears to be on negotiation and policy-level coordination, signaling a potential thaw in the deadlock.
Related Topics
Explore more stories

