Speaking on the topic, he said, "This is a wonderful concept in a country like India where regular elections cause regular disruptions. It will help bring in good governance. I don't agree with the allegations by the opposition."
Kumar also added that the Union Cabinet has approved the concept, but opposition parties are calling it anti-democratic and saying it is not feasible. "I don't subscribe to what the opposition is alleging. 'one nation, one election' is a wonderful concept, particularly in a country like India where regular elections cause huge disruption in governance," he said.
He further pointed out that India followed this system until 1967. "From 1952 elections onward, we had 'one nation, one election'. But due to several reasons, it was discontinued. It is a very good thing for the country. It is actually going to help bring in good governance, and I don't think it is anti-federal at all," he added.
Kumar also mentioned that the Indian Constitution does not oppose the idea. "If it had been anti-federal, the Constitution would have clearly mentioned that there should not be any 'one nation, one election' in the country. There is no such mention in the Constitution. So, I think it is good for the country and I urge all political parties to go beyond party lines and support this," he added.
When asked about the BJP government in Odisha completing 100 days, Kumar rejected criticism from the opposition, especially the BJD. "Most of the promises made in the BJP's election manifesto have been fulfilled. The government is working day and night, and I am sure this will be one of the best governments in the coming five years," he said.
(ANI)
Read Odisha News
